C.S. Lewis and Food

The food theme is not as prevalent in Lewis’ The Chronicles of Narnia as they are in Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings. I have chronicled a bit of the delicious appetite of Tolkien for food here. Yet, as I make my way through Lewis’ Chronicles I came across a brief delicacy in the meeting between the Sons of Adam and Eve and the beaver family. Their meeting leads to a festive meal described in this manner:

There was a jug of creamy milk for the children to enjoy (Mr. Beaven stuck to beer) and a great big lump of deep yellow butter in the middle of the table from which everyone took as much as he wanted to go with the potatoes, and all the children thought–and I agree with them–that there’s nothing to beat good freshwater fish if you eat it when it has been alive half an hour ago and has come out of the pan half a minute ago. And when they finished the fish Mrs. Beaver brought unexpectedly out of the over a great and gloriously sticky marmalade roll, steaming hot, and at the same time moved the kettle onto the fire, so that when they had finished the marmalade roll the tea was made and ready to be poured out…”And now,” said Mr. Beaver, pushing away his empty beer mug and pulling his cup of tea toward him, “if you will just wait till I’ve got my pipe lit up and going nicely–why, now we can get to business.”

This is a fairly descriptive scene. Much like Tolkien, business/war come only after a feast.

Laugh and Fear Not

In the Magician’s Nephew, Lewis describes Aslan’s reaction to Narnia’s first joke:

Laugh and fear not, creatures. Now that you are no longer dumb and witless, you need not always be grave. For jokes as well as justice come in with speech.

Yahweh too enjoys a good laugh (Psalm 2)

Quarreling, Machen’s Warrior Children, Reformed & CREC

C.S. Lewis argues that quarreling demands a certain a priori knowledge of right and wrong. Quarreling also demands a certain knowledge of the quarreler.

I follow–as I have for almost ten years–the Reformed wars. I follow these wars as someone who wants to avoid becoming one of Machen’s Warrior Children, but also as someone who receives some thrill from these battles. The problem with being too well informed is that you are sucked into these battles as if someone is picking a fight with you. Pastorally, these battles have little to no profit. They lead to all sorts of misconceptions. They divide. They create a category of people who are known for what they are against, rather than what they are for. They create a class of pugilists. Give them a dose of true Calvinistic sacramentology, and suddenly you are an enemy of the Reformed tradition; a tradition which for many goes only back to Princeton.

I say all these things because people speak past each other quite often in our micro-Reformation circles. I am certainly to blame at times, but I want to listen. I want to heed apostolic warnings. I want to be more Solomon-like in my wisdom: discerning what is helpful from what is not.

Those of us part of a confederation filled with convictions need to learn to deal with those who believe their convictions are typically not worth sharing. If we postmillennialists want the world, we are going to have to start talking and engaging those who don’t want it; and many of those label themselves Reformed. 

Practically, this means attending local associations in town as a start to this unity project. Explaining the C-R-E-C to people has a rather comical affect at times, but then it leads to perfectly natural questions on our view of Christian liberty–which usually entails, at least in the South, our view on alcohol consumption.

There is also the benefit of seeing just how broad the Christian world is. God is using the local charismatic preacher to denounce homosexuality more effectively than a thousand pages of academic journals.

My contention is that the Reformed world is generally small and ineffective due to its inability to see beyond itself. Granted, many of us are trying to take a different trajectory; a trajectory that comes with all sorts of bumps on the road. We have the choice of hitting the bump and keep moving or we have the choice of giving in and self-imploding. The gospel demands more.

C.S. Lewis on Hell

I spoke just now of fiddling while Rome burns. But to a Christian the true tragedy of Nero must be not that he fiddled while the city was on fire but that he fiddled on the brink of hell. You must forgive me for the crude monosyllable. I know that many wiser and better Christians than I in these days do not like to mention heaven and hell even in the pulpit. I know, too, that nearly all the references to this subject in the New Testament come from a single source. But then that source is Our Lord himself. People will tell you it is St. Paul, but that is untrue. These overwhelming doctrines are dominical. They are not really removable from the teaching of Christ or of His Church. If we do not believe them, our presence in this church is great tomfoolery. If we do, we must overcome our spiritual prudery and mention them.

–C. S. Lewis, “Learning in War-Time”

via Mark Horne

C.S. Lewis on Friendship

Friendship is unnecessary, like philosophy, like art. It has no survival value; rather it is one of the things that gives value to survival. – C. S. Lewis

Update: I asked Steve Wilkins what his thoughts were on Lewis’ quote, since his book on Frriendship and Hospitality was so helpful to our congregation. He wrote:

If we are built up in conformity to Jesus through the ministry of the members of the body (Eph. 4) then we may say that salvation is ministered to us from the Father, through the work of the Son, by the Spirit as He works in and through our brothers and sisters (our friends). The fact is I can’t be saved apart from the body of Jesus — and that’s the same as saying I can’t be saved apart from my friends. If that’s so, then friends are a necessity, not a luxury; they are central to life not auxiliary to it.

Narnia Mis-Applied?

Has Hollywood been faithful to C.S. Lewis’ vision for Narnia? Stephen Boyer writes a comprehensive critique of Hollywood’s mis-characterization of C.S. Lewis’ Narnia books. The article is worth every minute. Boyer concludes:

Aslan, without his appallingly hierarchical claws, is just another pussycat. I myself would prefer to hear him roar.

Lewis and Tolkien

On the frequent spats and insults that peppered Lewis’s friendship with J.R.R. Tolkien, Joseph Bottum quotes and concludes: “No harm in him,” Lewis wrote after one discussion with his friend, “only needs a smack or so.” One could say the same of so many friends.

From the archive: Mental Illiteracy…

Editor’s Note: This post first published in July 2004.

Is it just my experience or is society consumed with mental illiteracy? Either they can’t conjure up harmonious thoughts or cannot think harmoniously. If you are like me, after a few days without reading you begin to feel a sharp pain right in the middle of your forehead… well, maybe I am exaggerating a bit. Of course, the poorly trained mind can’t fathom reading at all. It prefers rather to meditate on what a 19th century scholar called the “conversation of rocks.” In other words, empty thoughts in an unproductive and non-stimulating mind.

There are two men that come to mind in establishing an impressive resume of literature consumption. The first is Rousas J. Rushdoony. He was known perhaps as the founder of the Christian Reconstructionist Movement. Rushdoony is known to have read a book a day since his teenage years until his death in 2001. Even listening to his sermons and reading his works give you a sense of experiencing someone who was far above the average reader or writer. Rushdoony was well read in politics, economics, theology, philosophy and more. He was indeed a great mind and example to model.

Secondly,  is the immortal C.S. Lewis. Who has not heard or even consumed the magic of Lewis’ works? I still recall reading through Screwtape Letters. It is almost impossible not to be drawn to Lewis’s works. His writings become art and you become an spectator of his mind. His style, charm, brilliance, all of it found in his works. Even the very last phrase leaves you imagining and even dreaming in broad daylight. Lewis is stimulating in every sense of the word. But what else can I say? Perhaps this quote by Lewis will captivate the way he thought about his great delight in life.
C.S. Lewis once wrote:

In reading great literature I become a thousand men and yet remain myself… Here, as in worship, in love, in moral action, and in knowing, I transcend myself; and am never more myself than when I do.

C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, Part XVII, Lewis on true faith

This is my final post in my series on C.S. Lewis’ Mere Christianity ( All 17  posts on Mere Christianity are found here). I have tried to point some salient features in this timeless classic. I believe I have been fortunate in some ways in my evaluation of Lewis. Further, I have tried to give him credit, though in crucial areas he strays from the Reformed tradition and beyond that, as far as a I know, Lewis was not an exegete. Hence, some of my criticism has been generally on an exegetical level. I confess I may have jumped to conclusions unwarranted by the immediate context, nevertheless, I have tried my best to expound on the brilliance of C.S. Lewis both as a writer and a thinker.
In this last post, I would like to conclude on Lewis’ discussion on faith picked up briefly on post XVI. In this final section Lewis comments on the nature of faith. In this instance, Lewis appears to be more consistent with Reformed theology than at any other section. His concern, which must be ours as well, is that generally faith has been seen as an emotional roller-coaster followed by some verbal utterance. Lewis writes:

What matters is the nature of the change in itself, not how we feel while it is happening. It is the change from being confident about our own efforts to the state in which we despair of doing anything for ourselves and leave it to God.1

This is the heart of Ephesians 2:8-9. What happens as faith is given to us (Philippians 1:29) is that we abandon all our feeble efforts to be pleasing before God. As the Scottish theologian Eric Alexander once stated: “The only thing we bring to our salvation is our sin which makes it necessary.”

In his final section, he writes:

Faith in Christ is the only thing to save you from despair at that point: and out of that faith in Him good actions must inevitably come.2

The despair of seeking to please God by our works is the climax of the unregenerate state. Only God can bring about true and genuine faith. This faith in turn, as the Reformers have pointed is not alone. Faith without works is dead, says James. Hence, Lewis concludes the exact same way Paul does in his discourse on Ephesians 2. Though salvation is by grace alone through faith alone, we are created for good works, which follow true faith in Messiah. Lewis notes that they “inevitably come.” It is not a matter of choice or willingness. if true faith abides, then, good works also follow.

 

  1. Mere Christianity, pg.130 [ back]
  2. pg.131 [ back]