I have recently read through James Jordan’s Creation in Six Days: A Defense of the Traditional Reading of Genesis 1. Though I am not certain I concur with all his conclusions, nevertheless Jim Jordan offers a compelling case to reject current scientific and theological denials of the traditional view of creation. a One of my earlier posts generated some interesting discussion here.
Perhaps most compelling and pervasive leitmotif of Jordan’s arguments derives from his remarkable insights into the influence of gnosticism in contemporary thought. According to Jordan, “gnosticism is the tendency to de-historicize and de-physicalize the Christian religion.” b On pages 82-95 Jordan analyzes carefully Meredith Kline’s Framework theory. He concludes that the framework theory has also succumbed to a form of gnostic thinking by allowing extra-biblical data form the bases of its thesis as opposed to God’s direct revelation to man.
Jordan does not simply attack what he considers to be erroneous interpretations of Genesis 1, he also gives a brief history of how gnosticism has affected the Reformed tradition in the area of the sacraments and worship. On page 72 he briefly touches on the consequences of gnostic thinking in our churches. Here are several signs that gnosticism has entered into our churches:
Whenever the ritual of the Lord’s Supper becomes a means of devotion and contemplation rather than an action performed in God’s presence. Whenever the Supper is restricted from small children because they have not reached some ‘age of reason.’ Whenever the sequence of the covenant renewal in worship is ignored and only the performance of certain ‘elements’ is considered important. Whenever the body is regarded as unimportant, so that we no longer need to kneel in worship, or greet one another with a holy kiss. c
Some may have strong disagreements with his position that Joseph was deeply involved in the writing of Genesis, nevertheless, his chapter on the influence of Gnosticism makes the entire volume a worthy read.