The Word and the World…making a little sense out of the senseless

Philip Kevin Goff wrote:

If American culture has moved toward evangelicals’ practice of making the personal public, so religion has moved in the direction of the broader culture. The way worship is conducted in growing numbers of evangelical congregations now replicates what once was confined to the TV screen. Sitting in your living room, you may feel just as close to the pastor as you would at the 5,000-person mega-church down the street. Unless you join one of the mega-church’s cell groups, these institutions can be as impersonal as mass media. Moreover, a visit to your local mega-church–including Starbuck’s coffee, entertaining music and drama, and a short talk that seems less like a sermon than an inspiring self-help lesson–will not seem much different than a trip to the mall.

I have stated many times that the demise of the church occurs when the Word is not preached and the sacraments are not administered. It would seem conspicuous to surmise that we ought to re-prioritize what the church has for two thousands years. But the American church is not interested in the altar nor the pulpit, but rather transforming the altar into a booth for weekly programs and the pulpits into a therapeutic pharmacy (consider Joel Osteen). In his article: TV’s Healing Powers – What ever happened to the televangelists of the 1980s? Philip Goff underlines the tendency of the modern church to become like the world and the world to become like the modern church. What the church so desperately despised in the beginning of the 20th century is what the church has become in the beginning of the 21st. Is it any wonder that whereas mega-churches increase, knowledge of Sacred Writ diminishes? The significance of this event is that the church can now become a safe haven for non-church goers so that non-church goers will still maintain their title as non-church goers while still attending a so-called church. It is not enough to radicalize our ministry nor is it enough to stabilize our ministry. In the first sense, radicalizing ministries generally entail giving up the religion of our forefathers by adapting to contemporary culture. The Scriptures, however, sees this matter is reverse form: the culture adapts to the Bible. In the latter scenario, stabilizing our churches generally entail giving up on changes. They say, “Since culture is changing so rapidly we ought to remain as we have always been.” Though, if a lesser of two evils existed (the philosophy of lesser of two evils can only be taken seriously by Christians when a third option does not exist; since it generally and most often does, that theory is generally un-biblical), the latter would be preferable, but the reality is both are erroneous. At particular times the church needs to change. It ought to reflect not culture, but special revelation. It is my contention that when a church never seeks change it has committed the same error of the “radical” model stated above. Semper Reformanda signifies that daily conformance to God’s Word leads to change individually and corporately.

Reflections on Rosie O’Donnell’s comments…

It has been almost a week since the infamous comments of Rosie O’Donnell on the View (click here for manuscript and video). In her own words: “…radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America.” Allow me to parse her words and make some brief comments. Rosie is a liberal, and like all liberals they have a cause and an agenda. She is the antithesis of a staid individual. She speaks on behalf of homosexuality, lesbianism, and every form of sinful activities one can fathom. That is her goal; her mission. When she says “radical Christianity is just as threatening as radical Islam in a country like America,” she may have a legitimate point. Of course, what is legitimate about her point has never crossed her mind. What she meant by her words is that the Christian faith with all its demands and moral absolutes opposing her absolutes, is criminal in its orientation just as Islam with its demands and absolutes are criminal with theirs. Obviously, we Christians do not wrap ourselves with bombs to blow up buildings and people; we on the other hand, dress ourselves with the armor of God (Ephesians 6). But do not doubt the fact that we are in a Christian jihad. This holy war extends beyond the spiritual warfares we have; it is a cosmic battle. The army of Christ’s Kingdom is pursuing to defeat anything or anyone who would claim superiority over our king. If there is one thing O’Donnell does not realize is how un-radical her comment really is. Christians aren’t radical as Muslims, we are extremely more radical than they can ever imagine. Christianity seeks to destroy all world powers and bring them to the submission of Christ the King. It seeks reconciliation with the world, but if they do not accept it they will be dealt with harshly and severely by our Mighty warrior. Our kingdom triumphs over the kingdom of Islam simply because our King has already demolished the darkness of Islam. What takes place from now until time is no more is the systematic elimination of that darkness is history. Rosie will never imagine how un-shocking her comparison really was.

A Visit to a Museum

The Chapel
The Pulpit
The Font
Venturing into the personal side of life, this past Saturday my wife and I visited the THE CHARLES HOSMER MORSE MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART “which houses the world’s most comprehensive collection of the works of Louis Comfort Tiffany (1848-1933) including Tiffany jewelry, pottery, paintings, art glass, leaded-glass windows, lamps, and the chapel interior he designed for the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago” (information taken from site). What a remarkable display of beauty and brilliance. Each piece contained such precision and clarity that it appeared to be capacious allabasters (or in this case vases) filled with poetry and chanting. In the period of one hour we studied each piece as carefully as possible attempting to decipher some new enigma in the mysterious colors of Louis Tiffany. However, the most enchanting of all parts was the chapel designed by Tiffany himself. A small chapel with the pulpit on the left, the altar at the center, and a baptismal font on the side; it was all it took for me to worship. The colors and the ambiance refreshed my weary soul and took me to the heavenlies. There in the quietness of the moment I prayed and wondered about the glory of God.

this is an audio post - click to play

Professor Frank Kik Dies


One year ago I took a Communication class taught by Rev. Frank Kik. He was a tall witty fellow with a dry humor, but a quick mind. Professor Frank Kik was the son of the renown Postmillenial Theologian Marcellus Kik. Frank Kik taught us many things of which I agreed and some which I strongly disagreed. Nevertheless he left a powerful impression on the students after that memorable week. I remember on the last day of class where all students aware of a possible surgery he would face that summer went to the front and laid hands on him and prayed. Frank Kik was controversial, bold, but caring and kind. I will never forget what he told me one time after a small homily I delivered: “Those whom God gifted will be required much.” Dr. Kik encouraged but was well aware of the responsibilities of ministry. He often played with me by speaking a few Spanish words though I had told him several times I was Brazilian. This was just his humorous nature that was evident everyday in class.
I remember a passage all students had to present as an introduction to a sermon was Esther 4:14 which reads: For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance will arise from another place, but you and your father’s family will perish. And who knows but that you have come to the royal position for such a time as this. Indeed God brought Rev. Kik to this world to accomplish His sovereign plan at an appointed time. May God be honored in this time of rejoicing and grief.

DR. FRANK KIK GOES HOME TO BE WITH THE LORD
Dr. Frank N. Kik, James Baird Professor of Practical Theology at the RTS Charlotte campus, has gone home to be with the Lord. Dr. Kik died on Tuesday, August 1, at 6:30 am. The funeral service will be held at Carmel Presbyterian Church, 2048 Carmel Road in Charlotte on Friday, August 4, at 11:00 am. Visitation hours will be from 6-8 p.m., Thursday at McEwen Funeral Home, 10500 Park Road in Pineville. There will also be a memorial service in Wichita, KS at Eastminster Presbyterian Church, where Dr. Kik pastored for 18 years, on Tuesday at 2:00 pm.

Viva Italia!!!


I am finally back to reality. I will be auditing a Greek class starting this next Monday and classes are only a month away. As for my World Cup prediction, I was correct! After Brazil’s embarrassing defeat to France (Brazil’s embarrassment is only surpassed by Zidane’s stupidity in front of 1.1 billion people) I knew that Italy would defeat the Germans and take the Cup in the final. The French, well the French did what they could. But when a team depends on one player to do magic until the end, they are expecting too much; not even Pele could’ve done it alone in 1970. Italy– though with a miserable offense and less than superb midfield– took the Cup because it played as a team. Granted, team work does not always work, but the Italians did it. Up till the last penalty kick, they were united with one purpose. Brazil on the other hand with its unequaled amount of talents were unable to show unity. Up to the French match, Brazil had played a meager soccer. Though humiliating Japan, and scoring three on Ghana, Brazil still could not come together.

Though some say that it’s time for someone else to take the Cup, I am not satisfied with that answer. I am sure the World will continue to admire Brazil’s fast and entertaining soccer. Everyone expects that the best must win, but Brazil as the best failed. Let this serve as a lesson. Quality with no unity is worthless. I venture to say we’ll be seeing some changes in the soccer world in the next few years. Who would have thought that the World Cup would receive more viewers than the NBA finals in the US? Are Americans finally softening up to real football or is this just another proof that illegals are taking over? Let’s leave that for another time.

American Vision’s Worldview Conference


I have returned two days ago from a marvelous conference. We had four days of fascinating lectures ranging from creation/evolution talks to constitutional hermeneutics (Herb Titus). The most intriguing and encouraging element of the conference was to see such a vast array of people coming together with one mind. This one-mindedness was seen in the issue of Covenant education. All attendees believe whole-heartedly that as Ray Moore stated: “Christian children need Christian education.” It is a consequence of our religion. Education is not neutral and neither should parents pretend that it is when they place their children in “Pharaoh’s schools.” If any attended this conference believing that there is an inch of neutrality somewhere in the realm of academia, that view was certainly shattered by the end of the Conference.

Gary Demar dedicated the conference to the late Professor Greg L. Bahnsen who fought vociferously for the authority of Christ over all of life, especially the mind. This was a fitting tribute. Among the many speakers (13 of them) I had the privilege of meeting Gary Demar, who has been instrumental in shaping my thinking on eschatology; Dr. Gary North, who as an economist has made me a more committed capitalist; Ray Moore (Exodus Mandate), who has deepened my cry for a revolutionary exodus of Christian Children from government schools; Brian Godawa, who has urged me to critically analyze Hollywood in light of Biblical story-telling (Fall, Creation, and Redemption); Herb Titus who as a polished communicator drove home the Constitutional formation of this beloved nation; and Jeff Ventrella who through his graciousness continues to train future lawyers to live by and apply the ultimate law of God. American Vision’s firm commitment to a vivacious faith that affects all of life has instilled in me a love for godly rule and godly conviction in a world of lawlessness.

Silent Confession

This past Sunday, after our corporate confession, the liturgist directed us to a time of silent confession. I sat and wondered and wondered, but little did I confess. What has happened to me that silence is a hindrance to my confession? Perhaps this similar experience will encourage you as it has encouraged me.

Ronald Nash Dies…

ronnash.jpgRonald H. Nash, a great evangelical philosopher and apologist, died early this morning in Florida. Nash was a longtime professor at Western Kentucky University, Reformed Theological Seminary, and, until a stroke last year, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He was an heir of the theological tradition of Carl F.H. Henry, and was an lifelong admirer and student of Augustine of Hippo, his favorite philosopher.

Read on: A Great man dies but his voice lives on…

Missio Dei

Another school year has begun at Reformed Theological Seminary in Orlando. One of the surprising elements of this semester has been my Mission’s class. One of our many assignments is Bosch’s classic on Missiology. Bosch may come to unique conclusions, but his conclusions are well worth studying. One of the central themes of Bosch is that the Missio Dei is rooted in the person of God. In other words, Missions is an ontological concept. It is a triune effort to bring the message of God to the nations. Unlike the popular truncated notion that missions serve merely as a tool to save sinners from God’s wrath, Bosch and others argue that it encompasses much more than the spiritual dimension. God is indeed concerned about the redemption of the cosmos.

The general tendency of the church has been to compartmentalize the work of missions to a mere category of the church (side by side with youth ministry, catechism class, etc,). Nevertheless, missions is not an aspect of the church, it is the overarching goal of the church.

Reflections On Developing A Spiritual Pattern

In a time when discipline is pushed aside due to pragmatism, spiritual theology is pushed aside due to evangelical lethargy. It is a daunting task to set spiritual goals when they may be in a near future altered by our schedules, children, and completing the list, we have our fallenness, which only directs our circumstances away from spirituality.

The Christian life is less than appealing when we consider that the usual outcome of spirituality may be the ever powerful attack of evil forces (Satan) on the godly. Similar to Lewis’ works on spirituality, the Evil One never ceases to attack the godly. It appears that the better prepared a Christian is to face temptations, the more intense is the bombardment. On the other hand, Spiritual Theology by Simon Chan has significantly helped me to wrestle with these tensions. Digesting this work has encouraged me with a list of viable options to enhance my experience and to harmonize the struggles with the exhilarating moments of joy in my Christian life.

It is my desire to pursue goals that are realistic rather than forceful. Chan writes similarly when he speaks of those who in the beginning found contentment with their new goals, but with time found them to be overwhelming and abandoned the practice altogether.

Another difficulty in establishing a rule of life is that as Chan puts it, “embracing the rule of life means allowing our lives to be reconstituted by this new pattern” (pg.150). There are severe implications to a new pattern of living. Nevertheless, embracing a simple life is an art by which with proper exercising life will resemble more and more the image of Christ. In thinking about these profound issues I have sought aid in the idea of submission to Christ. In submission there is comfort in knowing that my errors in this process will only lead me to depend even more on Christ.

Regarding a plan for developing a spiritual life I have considered a similar pattern to what Chan offers:

I. A period of heart preparation seems necessary. This I call the “cleansing process” which I liken to the washings of the priests before they entered the tabernacle.

II. After cleansing, I have chosen to continue my annual reading of the Scriptures rather than the one or two chapters divorced from its redemptive history. Sometimes during this year I may choose to read a book with a devotional nature such as Jerry Bridges or John Piper. I prefer to call this transition “Spiritual Nourishment.”

III. Further, I have set a time for short meditation on the spiritual significance of what was read and what may be its direct application to my life. This is called “Holy Reflection.”

IV. Then, a time of prayer which would follow common liturgy. A) Praise/Adoration, B) Thanksgiving, C) Petition, D) Praying for consistency in my devotional life. This is entitled: “Holy Conversation.” This is a genuine interaction with  God.

V. Finally, singing should be the “Response of Gratitude.” This could be a hymn or a Psalm that expresses my present sentiments. It may be about an attribute of God or the regular Christian experience.

This seems to be an attainable pattern of life. It should take approximately 20-25 minutes. By God’s grace with proficiency it may increase. In time I pray it may become as natural as my academic pursuits or my daily interactions with my wife.

This is the most profound and substantial foundation for my new rule (pattern) of life. Therefore, it seems only logical that all other forms of spiritualities should be a compliment to this rather than an additional exercise. For example, one way of implementing another idea to this foundation is found in the common theological area of general revelation. Perhaps my devotional time would be enhanced in content if it were done in the context of nature. Whether in the woods or near a lake (which I have access) or on a location where my eyes could visibly engage the mountains and valleys. All these experiences will accentuate and heighten the spiritual capacity to adorn my soul with God’s aroma and presence.

A final observation regards the remainder activities of the day. It is a fact that when the business of my academic life begins I quickly lose sight or even forget the experience I have had. One way to eliminate this difficulty is to reserve the spiritual devotion to the end of the day. However, this does not seem like a possible alternative since I function better in the early part of the day. In order to help in this dilemma I have proposed a few ideas used primarily by early saints. These ideas will solidify Paul’s command to pray without ceasing. Chan calls these “ejaculatory prayers.” These are prayers that can be uttered or consciously thought about throughout the day. To make this practice vivid I have committed to read and memorize certain portions of the Book of Common Prayer which I have found to be an invaluable treasure.

It is my prayer that this new rule of life may be light rather a legalistic burden. I have hope that in God’s grace He may find mercy on me, a sinner, and permit me to enjoy the richness of the Christian faith.