2 Replies to “A Classic Interview: Ron Paul Vs. Laura Ingraham on Foreign Policy”
Ingraham is a typical slave. She obeys the orders to shift the issue, focus on emotion rather than substance, and tote the part line. She wouldn’t know how what a rebuttal was if it slapped her. Paul is no gifted speaker but he always offers substance. And it never is it treated by his opponents. Arguments don’t matter to tube slaves, watchers or workers.
A lawyer, Ingraham knows the law-school maxim: “if you have the facts pound the facts; if you don’t, the pound the table.” She’s a noise maker, completely worthless outside her image, clout, credentials, and gender.
The free press in on the web, with thinkers like you and I who have blogs. If we can change a few. …just a few is powerful.
Ingraham is a typical slave. She obeys the orders to shift the issue, focus on emotion rather than substance, and tote the part line. She wouldn’t know how what a rebuttal was if it slapped her. Paul is no gifted speaker but he always offers substance. And it never is it treated by his opponents. Arguments don’t matter to tube slaves, watchers or workers.
A lawyer, Ingraham knows the law-school maxim: “if you have the facts pound the facts; if you don’t, the pound the table.” She’s a noise maker, completely worthless outside her image, clout, credentials, and gender.
The free press in on the web, with thinkers like you and I who have blogs. If we can change a few. …just a few is powerful.
represent my blog –
view_entries.php
view_entries.php
view_entries.php