The Problem with DINKS

This essay is not your standard Advent offering. In fact, it is the anti-Advent piece.

I find it fascinating that as we near the feast of the nativity, and while the world enters into the “thrill of hope” for the incarnate baby, countless adults are revealing a mosaic of selfishness, exalting their dual-income status and cherishing their joy of being childless. These are the DINKS (dual-income-no-kids) of our generation.

In this article, I offer a few key statistical points of this obtuse generation and then conclude with the biblical alternative of Genesis.

Faithful American Churches

While there is much to critique in American churches–its mainline apostasy, sexual compromises– we still can claim to have the most faithful churches in the world–numerically and qualitatively. These include churches of all sizes, in every tradition, proclaiming Christ as King and faithfully administering the sacraments, and preserving the faith once and for all delivered to the saints. Our critiques should not overlook the immensity of fidelity among churches throughout the United States.

At this stage of history, we are attempting to build on the benediction of a Christian heritage where the language of Christendom is still very much embedded in societal institutions. Therefore, this allows us to strengthen the culture of our churches in the biblical grammar and persuade others that the city of God is superior to alternative cities.

There aren’t one or ten, but thousands upon thousands of persevering bodies who will not bow down to Caesar but to Christ alone. This remarkable reality gives me confidence in the preservation of this country and the continual blessings of God upon our churches and, thus, upon our culture.

Perspectivalist Podcasts

I have been producing several new podcasts for The Perspectivalist, including a new experiment on video. Check out my newest releases:

*Season 4, Episode 15, How the Grinch Stole Advent (A 30-Minute Conversation with Dr. Alistair Roberts)

This episode looks at the Season of Advent with new eyes; contemplating its proper place in the Calendar of the Church. Advent precedes Christmas because the emotional and normative demands the meditation of promise before fulfillment.

*Subscriber-Only Episode: My Response to Lecrae’s View of the Church (17 minutes)

This episode is available to Anchor and Substack subscribers, and it is a video overview of Lecrae’s recent screed against the Church. It’s my first try at it, so be generous. If it proves successful, I’d love to offer all subscribers more of these commentaries (see the link in the comment section).

*Season 4, Episode 14: Giving Thanks Like a Christian (9 minutes)

This episode is a short overview of the theology of gratitude and the presuppositions behind it. Appropriate for the recent Thanksgiving season but applicable for all seasons.

*Season 4, Episode 13: Samson: God’s Misunderstood Hero

This episode offers a succinct look at Samson’s life. I still believe he is one of the most misunderstood Priests in the Bible. I look at three features of Samson’s life to consider: a) his sexual desires, b) his Nazaritic vow, and c) his messianic nature. For those interested in the Samson story, this is the perfect offering.

You can listen to all my subscriber audio content for $0.99 a month: https://podcasters.spotify.com/…/uriesou…/subscribe

It includes episodes on baptism, eschatology, and my recent overview of Lecrae’s perspective on the Church. Or, you can subscribe to all my content (audio and essay) at my substack: https://drbrito.substack.com/

I am grateful to George Reed for the editing and intro/outro music.

The CREC Aficionados?

Presbyterians and Baptist pastors (the worlds I am most acquainted with) are dealing with Moscow fans in their congregations. I know this because I receive questions from such parishioners regularly. 99% of them do not want to cause friction in their local churches, but they are tired of direct attacks from the pulpit about the CREC or Douglas Wilson or some supposed boogeyman called the Federal Vision. Most of them have read a few things I’ve written (though I am far from the most prolific in our group). Still, lots of them have come across the Canon+ app, Crosspolitic, or the various high-quality publications from Canon Press, and invariably something from Pastor Wilson.

My recommendation is rarely, if ever, to encourage them to leave. In fact, my encouragement is that they find peace within the body and not raise their convictions to issues of first importance. However important their issues may be, there is a greater right than being right. They should speak with the pastor. Build a history of peace-making within the body. And if there should be an opportunity to leave, leave peacefully and quietly without internet noise. We have enough growing pains not to desire additional turmoil, which is why we don’t waste time selling our agendas in private meetings with members from other churches. We invest in our calling as local bodies and shepherd those under our care, and God gives the increase.

The reaction of high-profile pastors to the supposed threat of Moscow/CREC is, first and foremost, pastoral. Kevin DeYoung is genuinely seeking to protect his flock from what he perceives as a danger to the long-term well-being of his congregants. Others speak out from a position of defensiveness and even react aggressively, which exemplifies a lack of confidence in the ministry of the Gospel. These churches/pastors become watchdogs, constantly looking for trouble where there is none, thereby creating congregants suspicious of everything and everyone who does not uphold identical dogmas.

My suggestion to pastors is to draw these questioners close. Engage the topic with concerned parishioners and grant that their interest in healthy families, a strong political backbone, and a high view of worship (things our Communion cherishes) are good things to pursue and that you share these pursuits, though from a different perspective. But don’t act defensively or aggressively. I guarantee you will find much more agreement if you carefully engage rather than overreact.

Should I Follow the Church Calendar?

Dear friend,

You expressed so much joy in coming into a liturgical understanding of time. As you and I have experienced growing up in non-liturgical traditions, the Church Calendar is a tough sell in our evangelical culture. You asked me where you think you should begin communicating these thoughts with family and friends.

The first point to consider is that a lack of calendar knowledge is not a lack of godliness. So, you should avoid chronological snobbery when considering these issues and remember just how long it took you to get here.

I don’t think the denial of a church calendar stems primarily from historical illiteracy, though it may at times. The issue is not “to calendar or not to calendar?” but “which calendar?” Most in our culture have chosen calendars of their own making. They are fond of national, localized, athletic festivities over and above other ecclesiastical memorials.

As I’ve said, it’s not a poor keeping of time; it’s a selected keeping of time. I want to argue that there is a time that supersedes civic time, which is Church time. Of course, some take strict positions based on confessional commitments. I have little beef with them, and they are not my audience. My audience is those still uncertain about this business and eager to contemplate its place in their lives.

Now, I know that once we begin this conversation, there will be all sorts of fears about celebrating days for saints, angels, and other such things. But I am simply arguing for a celebration of the evangelical church calendar, namely the evangelical/Reformed seasons: Advent, Christmas, Epiphany, Lent, Good Friday, Easter (Ascension), and Pentecost. If most churches cherished and celebrated a general outline for the calendar, we could begin to see a greater harmonization of themes, topics, and vision for the church universal.

If some were to say, “Why can’t we sing Christmas carols whenever we want to; after all, every Sunday is Christmas?” The answer is: “For the same reason you don’t sing “Happy Birthday” to your child whenever you want to. Every Sunday is indeed Christmas, but every Sunday is also Easter and Pentecost and Trinity Sunday, etc.”

You can do those things, but it takes away from the appointed observance of such a time. If some were to say: “Why am I bound to observe this church calendar?” Answer: “You are not bound to. Your church is not bound to; simply, history has shown its wisdom, and its longevity has shown its importance.” But most importantly, the Bible offers a rich theology of time, and God’s people throughout sacred history have followed such patterns in remembering and commemorating defining moments in the lives of our forefathers.

There is a historical harmony established on these general feast days that all churches of all ages share. This alone should be a persuasive argument.

In sum, my point is that patterns, rhythms, and feasts play a role in the rationale of the Scriptures, and this is a good place to begin these dialogues.

Many blessings as we approach the first Sunday of the Church year.

Pastor Uriesou Brito