Dividing Old and New

We must confess the truthfulness that evangelicalism has turned the Old Testament pages into a series of unconnected moralistic stories. This reminds me of a lecture delivered by R.C. Sproul one time where he asked for a copy of the Bible. A young college student threw a copy of the New Testament Pocket-Size Bible to him. Sproul looked at it and threw it right back and said, “I asked for a Bible, young man!” We have disassociated the Scriptures and treated it as a collection of unrelated stories. The reality, however, is that the Bible is a collection of unified stories made to build on one another with each story adding a more nuanced and elevated art form to the big picture. It is not only that the Old Testament Scriptures are Christological, but the New Testament cannot be understood apart from its Old Testament context. The presuppositions of the Gospels and Apostolic writings depend heavily on the assumptions of the Law and the Prophets. The Bible, to paraphrase Luther, is alive, it speaks to me; it has feet, it runs after me; it has hands, it lays hold of me. To categorically divide Old and New is to amputate the Scriptural intent to hold and illumine our hearts and minds.

Share Button

4 Replies to “Dividing Old and New”

  1. Pingback: fuck

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *