PROOF OF VACCINE to Worship

It has come to my attention that churches are beginning/or will soon start to require COVID vaccination proof of members/visitors for in-person service. I don’t want to make any bold assertions, except to say boldly that ecclesiastical assertions about vaccination proof are tyrannical. And I say these things as a pastor who would gladly give his blood for mother church. But we must all be equal-opportunity offenders and call BS (blatant sin) wherever it is found.

It’s important to begin with some basic church math for starters. In Church history and the biblical data, a gathered assembly is only legitimate if it incorporates these three marks of a church:

a) Preaching, b) Sacraments, and Discipline.

On preaching, Louis Berkhof says, “This is the most important mark of the Church. . . . It does not mean that the preaching must be perfect and absolutely pure, but that it must be true to the fundamentals of the Christian religion and must have a controlling influence on faith and practice.” The preaching sets the stage for much of church culture.

Concerning the Sacraments, a local body must affirm the presence of Christ, whether spiritually or bodily. Disputes on this topic have led to numerous conclusions, but the general premise is that the Supper must be practiced, whether frequently or infrequently in a local body. The Gospel rule is that a church must “do this.”

Finally, the act of discipline must be a faithfully executed practice in a local body (Matt. 18:15–20; 1 Cor. 5:1–13). If ministers do not discipline in excommunication, rebuke, exhortation, encouragement, and love, the church will quickly find itself surrounded by an army of disgruntled and unrighteous people who give ear to their own voices and despise submission and truth.

These requirements sustain the church’s worship and practice. Without them, a church one doth not have. We cannot practice one without the others. Similarly, for a church to operate legitimately, she cannot demand members in good standing to fit into a particular box as a pre-requisite to taste and see that the Lord is good in the gathered assembly.

And this is where we find ourselves entering the terrain of the profane when some churches demand as a pre-requisite for worship some form of vaccination proof. While the three marks above define a true church, the addition of other marks de-mark a church. Such stipulations go against the very fabric of ecclesiastical life by formulating its own sacramental life and stipulating its own admission cards.

By requiring proof of vaccination, such leadership is adding a fourth mark, thus fabricating an unbiblical requirement for worship. When local shepherds add this mark–for whatever noble reasons used–they have lost the ability to properly minister within the established bounds of an authentic church. They have forsaken their callings and thus operate outside the boundaries of ecclesiastical authority. They are, in my estimation, abusing their legitimate role and should be defrocked, and should they be allowed to remain within their professional status, without any ecclesiastical repercussion, local church members are justified in leaving such bodies to attend safe and biblical churches not constrained by unbiblical and abusive demands.

While members are within their rights to make decisions that best suit their families and their medical concerns, ministers are not given the right to make ecclesiastical imperatives of their parishioners on the threat of non-entrance and non-participation of in-person gathering. The gates of Zion are open to all, and while matters of wisdom should be considered by all members of the church, no minister is allowed to assert himself above his prescribed duties.

The Price of COVID

State and local lockdowns did not work. Church lockdowns did not work. This entire concoction served as a testament to the spirit of the age. Many needed care, many died, many needed to stay home, but millions and millions did not and should not have erased their humanity for an entire year. I have been alerting to this for some time, but Peter Leithart summarized it rather cogently:

“We’ve sacrificed all the social and cultural activities that lend beauty and richness to life, things that make life more than bare biological survival. We sacrificed life to preserve life. In the name of love, we canceled love.”

In entirely new ways, we have learned to be creative about not doing those things we are called to do as humans. We have altered the divine engineering of humanity to fit our own fears and the end result has been the eradication of social rituals for the sake of non-productive ones.

This struck me recently when someone mentioned how proud they were of our church for gathering to celebrate an event with singing. It took me a second to realize just what precisely the individual meant. We have been doing the same sorts of things with incessant praise and fortitude for a really long time. We have been living life for the entire year, while many have been surviving life. That’s no way to live. I am proud of our community and so many others who chose to do the same, whether in Florida or Alberta, Canada.

The tragedy is exemplified further when you consider these past twelve months that the world has consolidated all of its sicknesses and diseases into one. COVID has served as the substitutionary atonement for every other ailment in civilization. While prior, we had a diversity of sicknesses to choose from and to mourn, and to add to the arsenal of post-fall catastrophes, now the entire world focused on one single virus. Our attention was laser-focused, and the experts told us to hold on to whatever we thought was wrong with our bodies to concentrate exclusively on one thing. We traded the normalcy of pain and suffering in diverse ways for the overwhelming mechanism and movements of a virus. It’s almost as if we forgot the suffering of cancer patients or the winter flu. We adjusted our expectations and in the process, we gave COVID a preeminent place in our sickness calendar and the hierarchy of life. What should we expect from a society that had twelve months to pour all their fears into one solitary thing? We can expect widespread panic and fear of living. Our present obesity, cancer treatments, and more served the higher goal of avoiding one viral invasion.

The process was enlightening in a hundred ways. It opened my eyes as a cultural observer to the things that matter in society; to the fascinations of human beings; to what people really treasure at the end of the day; to the lengths of incalculable hours someone will go to avoid living. But that is not the end of the story. In this process, a lot of people woke up to the reality that reality itself is worth living in the direst of circumstance. Many, however, treated this entire season as a way of revealing their self-righteousness. Double-masked: check. Shaming others for not masking: check. Wearing a mask alone in my car: check. Avoiding family: check.

We need to admit that this entire charade of propaganda that drew even the most conservative in our midst to their cause won the cultural battle in 2020. They succeeded in revealing that our deepest fears are ready to emerge at the first sight of a confrontation to our convictions. We have been tested instead of the spirits and we have failed as a Christian society. We have willingly given over our spheres to the nice man. He took it and is eagerly making plans to give it back to you one piece at a time for the next 100-years. Of course, by then, we will all be dead. What have we done?

And this leads me to my final observations: the survival rate now is determined by those who say, “Hell No!” out loud. If you have seen the light, your time to test your renewed commitment will come. James Coates and others understood the cause. Will we understand what is actually at stake? We may be seeing a new Christendom emerge from the ashes of COVIDom. My hope is that this Christendom is valiant and refuses to give an ounce to the nice man.