You can conclude with some degree of certainty that men who spend most of their time consumed with internet squabbles have a low view of authority. They rarely seek knowledge from within their ecclesiastical authorities but function as independent contractors of expertise. They often come through the theme of anonymity and can opine without regard, speaking carelessly, prolifically, and unrestrained.
They treasure their independence and ability to function, whether ecclesiastically or theologically. They are practical Anabaptists in their assessment of reality and, in many cases, fall easily into various winds of doctrine. Their resumes may include multiple churches and different theological trajectories within a short period of time, all of which they treasure, depending on which season they find themselves. They become consuming fires for their new-found faith, at least for a short season. Everyone becomes an enemy, even if he just held that same idea a few months prior.
These kinds of rough edges need to be worked out among youthful zealots. They need a history of consistency before they speak as interpreters. There is a season where they should be observers before political hermeneuticians.
Jude addresses this revolutionary spirit that seeks dissension within the church by using their voices to draw innocent parishioners to their cause. They even come to our love-feasts to persuade. Even if their intentions are noble, stemming from pure motives, they must be tamed by pastoral practice and discipleship.
These young men often do not provide stability to their spouses or children. They damage the cause of Christ and his Bride. We should watch out for such voices and pray that God would grant them discernment and humility.
4 Replies to “The Twitter Zealots”